Meta-Propositional Reasoning About the Truth or Falsity of Propositions
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
the assessment of truth and falsity in literary propositions
one of the main subjects of rhetoric is assigning the truth and falsity of declarative sentences. if a proposition may be assessed as a truth or falsity, it will be considered as a declarative sentence, otherwise it will be compositional. there were some theologians and philosophers who brought up the discussion of truth and untruth of declaration for the first. although all literal proposition...
متن کاملAggregating Truth and Falsity Values
We propose an axiom set for the aggregation of truth values, which leads to the characterization of two truth-aggregation families, a prudent and an enthusiastic. The first one has a cautious attitude choosing between two observed values the one which is more uncertain. The second one has an enthusiastic behavior and will reinforce the result if it observes twice the truth or twice the falsity....
متن کاملDegrees of Truth, Degrees of Falsity
In this paper I recall the reasons in favour of extending the classical conception of truth to include degrees of truth as well as truth value gaps and gluts, then provide a sketch of a new system of logic that provides all of these simultaneously. Despite its power, the resulting system is quite simple, combining degrees of truth and degrees of falsity to provide a very flexible and elegant co...
متن کاملA Critical Review of Thinking About What is True, Possible and Irrelevant in Reasoning from or Reasoning About Conditional Propositions
Truth-table tasks probe for interpretations of by having people evaluate truth-table cases (e.g., , , , <not-A_not-C) as making a rule true/false, be consistent or irrelevant to the rule. Recent studies and reviews looking at truth-table task performance have used their conclusions about the ‘facts’ presented in the literature to evaluate the explanatory ade...
متن کاملPropositions in Propositional
In this paper it is shown that addition of certain reductions to the standard cut removing reductions of deductions in propositional logic makes propositional logic non-normalizable. From this follows that some provable propositions in propositional logic has no direct proof.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychologica Belgica
سال: 1997
ISSN: 2054-670X,0033-2879
DOI: 10.5334/pb.919